Clinical insight · Best Connection · Fillers in Norway Restylane vs. Lumifil – why more clinics in Norway are choosing Lumifil When clinics in Norway evaluate fillers, one of the most common questions is: what is the difference between Restylane and Lumifil, and why are more and more practitioners choosing Lumifil? The answer comes down to indication, treatment goal and clinic strategy.
Restylane What is Restylane? Restylane is one of the most well-known hyaluronic acid fillers globally and has been used in aesthetic medicine for many years. Its broad product portfolio and long clinical history make it a safe choice for clinics that prioritise documentation and brand recognition.
Lumifil What is Lumifil? Lumifil is a modern hyaluronic acid filler that has gained increasing adoption in the Norwegian market. With non-detectable levels of residual BDDE, good tissue integration and a cost-effective profile, it has become a preferred choice for many Norwegian clinics.
Clinical documentation Comparative clinical study – Lumifil vs. Restylane (WSRS) Lumifil has been clinically evaluated in comparison with Restylane using the standardised Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). The studies were conducted at major university hospitals and carried out in accordance with approved protocols for medical devices.
Lumifil
Restylane
Lumifil (pink) and Restylane (grey) show comparable WSRS scores throughout the entire 24-week period. Source: comparative clinical study, conducted at a university hospital in accordance with approved protocols for medical devices.
Comparison Restylane vs. Lumifil – the most important differences
*In accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and applicable standards.
Why Lumifil is growing 6 reasons more clinics are choosing Lumifil
Clinic strategy The combination strategy many clinics use Many clinics choose to use both products strategically, with Lumifil covering standard treatments and volume while Restylane is reserved for specific indications and the premium segment.
Frequently asked questions Restylane vs. Lumifil – FAQ
Restylane Established premium brand Long clinical track record and extensive documentation. Still a strong choice for specific indications and the premium segment.
Lumifil The preferred choice in Norway Growing rapidly thanks to price, flexibility, natural results and documented clinical performance.
Restylane What is Restylane? Restylane is one of the most well-known hyaluronic acid fillers globally and has been used in aesthetic medicine for many years. Its broad product portfolio and long clinical history make it a safe choice for clinics that prioritise documentation and brand recognition.
- Long clinical documentation and an established brand
- Predictable and stable results
- Broad product portfolio for many indications
- Still preferred for advanced treatments such as tear trough
Lumifil What is Lumifil? Lumifil is a modern hyaluronic acid filler that has gained increasing adoption in the Norwegian market. With non-detectable levels of residual BDDE, good tissue integration and a cost-effective profile, it has become a preferred choice for many Norwegian clinics.
- Non-detectable levels of residual BDDE
- Cost-effective with a high margin per treatment
- Flexible across multiple indications and treatment areas
- Comparatively clinically evaluated against Restylane
Clinical documentation Comparative clinical study – Lumifil vs. Restylane (WSRS) Lumifil has been clinically evaluated in comparison with Restylane using the standardised Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). The studies were conducted at major university hospitals and carried out in accordance with approved protocols for medical devices.
WSRS score over time – Lumifil vs. Restylane Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale · Lower score = better result
3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
What the chart shows Lumifil and Restylane show very similar WSRS scores from baseline through the entire 24-week period. This indicates that Lumifil delivers clinical efficacy comparable to Restylane, at a lower cost to the clinic.
Comparison Restylane vs. Lumifil – the most important differences
Restylane vs. Lumifil – characteristics
Characteristic
Restylane
Lumifil
Brand
Established premium
Modern alternative
Documentation
Very extensive
Including comparative studies
Price level
Higher
Lower
BDDE level
Low
Non-detectable*
Result
Stable and predictable
Flexible and natural
Demand in Norway
Stable
Growing
Why Lumifil is growing 6 reasons more clinics are choosing Lumifil
1 Better clinic economics A lower purchase price means a higher margin per treatment and the ability to offer more competitive prices to patients.
2 Flexible use Suitable for lips, cheeks, jawline and general volume restoration; one product covers many needs.
3 Clean formulation Non-detectable levels of residual BDDE and highly purified hyaluronic acid, important for clinics that prioritise patient safety.
4 Documented performance A comparative clinical study against Restylane shows comparable efficacy measured on the WSRS scale over 24 weeks.
5 Natural results Softer tissue integration, natural movement and predictable results are reported by many practitioners.
6 Aligned with today's market Patients are asking for natural results, lower prices and less overtreatment; Lumifil hits all three.
Clinic strategy The combination strategy many clinics use Many clinics choose to use both products strategically, with Lumifil covering standard treatments and volume while Restylane is reserved for specific indications and the premium segment.
Lumifil + Restylane – how they are used strategically Lumifil → standard treatments, volume and everyday clinic use · Restylane → specific indications such as tear trough and premium treatments. The result: better economics, flexibility and the ability to offer differentiated pricing.
Frequently asked questions Restylane vs. Lumifil – FAQ
Is Lumifil as good as Restylane? For many standard treatments, clinics find that Lumifil delivers good and predictable results, supported by comparative clinical studies, while at the same time offering better clinic economics.
Can the products be used interchangeably? Partially, but the correct product should always be chosen based on the indication and treatment area. Many clinics use them in a complementary way.
Why are more practitioners choosing Lumifil now? The combination of price, ease of use, natural results and clinically documented performance makes it an attractive choice in today's market.
When should clinics still choose Restylane? For advanced treatments such as tear trough, clinics with a premium profile and patients who specifically request the brand, Restylane is still a strong choice.
Conclusion · Best Connection Restylane is still strong, but Lumifil has become the preferred choice in Norway. Not only because of price, but because of a good balance between documented clinical performance, flexibility and economics. The most successful clinics use both strategically and cover the full treatment spectrum with a single portfolio from Best Connection.
- Choose Lumifil for flexibility, price and volume treatments
- Choose Restylane for specific indications and the premium segment
- Combine the two for optimal operations and the broadest possible treatment offer